There's a running store near me that does this.

They have a 50% OFF! rack out front, I remember looking at the sale price and thinking it looked pretty much like the retail price...the saw they marked all the items up 50%.

Pays to watch prices. And not shop at sleazy spots.

This is what I'm wondering as well. IMAP isn't an option, just POP3.

If I want to use my Gmail account as an 'email client', my only option to connect to an external email address is via POP3, at least in Canada.

Is this the case elsewhere? I don't see IMAP as an option with the 'Check email from another account' option in the settings. Their 'Learn More' button says:

====

Add another email account on your computer
In a web browser, at mail.google.com, you can add:

Another Gmail account.
A non-Gmail account like Yahoo or iCloud Mail.
You can add up to five email addresses to your Gmail account.

In the Gmail app, you can also add another email account.

However, you can't add accounts like Exchange and Post Office Protocol (POP). Learn how to add an account in the Gmail app.

But I thought free-market capitalism was good?!

That's interesting because in my social circle fewer and fewer people are on it, or using it.

I'm kinda stuck with it for work and org-related stuff, and get the feeling lots others are the same.

And in that line of thought, I run several accounts...but it's just me. But I guess that's more in their count.

Beyond the bots, there's probably quite a smaller number of actual humans looking at IG.

We all know this 'climate change' is a hoax.

They should save a ton of money and do this stupid wall for just the poors. (The rich know this is just another socialist plot to steal the their money.)

Err I think that's more coincidence than anything. I am highly doubtful that's the actual causation.

According tho this, if a woman found herself in a famine state at 9 months, then she wouldn't give birth until more food was eaten? That's not how it works.

If you eat more butter than you can absorb, you'll still absorb a LOT of it, as much as your body can, which will be more than you need.

Sure, you can eat so much that you eventually shit it out. But most people don't eat THAT much. They still eat way more than they have any need to.

You seem to dwell on total fringe scenarios that have little bearing on what 99% of the population is actually experiencing. Stop bothering me with that shit.

Next you're going to tell me water is dangerous because you can also drink too much of it.

It's closer to 18 minutes.

If you download torrents of 1hr shows, they're usually about 42mins long.

Scary to think of how much of my time could have been consumed by that over the last few decades.

Isn't a main complaint with politicians/parties is they only focus on their own term, and don't make any long-term plans?

Shit or get off the pot.

10yr plans are fine. BAD 10yr plans are a problem. Same with short term plans.

Sure, you can overload your system.

How much fat does the average person have to eat to actually hit that limit?

Certainly enough to put on SIGNIFICANT amounts of weight, and on a day-to-day basis, the vast majority (if not all) calories consumed are absorbed by the average person.

The underlying point is if you're eating huge amounts of a macro nutrient, don't expect to piss or shit out what you don't 'need'. The vast majority of it WILL remain in your body.

And that birthing 'fact' sounds extremely unlikely too. They can literally tell you what DAY you're likely to give birth based on the stage of development. If what you said were true, there'd be huge variations, not a pretty standard 9 months.

I've never heard 'eat more for a few days and you'll give birth'.

I can't believe the nonsense that gets posted. Is that you RFK Jr?!

I hope someone marks this as funny, because that's a hilariously ignorant take.

If we just excreted unused calories, obesity would be unheard of.

Excess protein is mostly converted to fat or partially carbs. Calories in, if unused, get stored. Happens with all macro nutrients.

If your urine is even remotely 'thick', it's not protein or anything you're likely to say, it's dehydration, or something much more concerning.

Good. Fucking. Grief.

You haven't been on a fitness forum for a while then.

The obsession with protein by some (many?) is kind of insane, trying to get 40g+ each meal, plus shakes on top of that, exceeding 200g per day.

Also, don't forget protein recommendations are for lean body mass, not total body mass. There are online calculators for this, and your lean body mass is a lot lower than you'd think, meaning you really don't need all that much protein, even for athletes.

Glad to see this research coming out, I've been wondering what this excess would result in, knowing it can't possibly be good.

What are you talking about?

There are all sorts of options for dealing with beavers. I've helped build flow devices that solves flooding problems. (Beavers don't like the sound of flowing water and try to stop it...but if you can fence off where that happens with a very simple flow device, then problem solved.)

Details here as just one example: https://ancillary-proxy.atarimworker.io?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthefurbearers.com%2Four-...

And as a general rule of thumb, and idiots like this will never learn: you can't kill your way out of wildlife issues.

More will always return to fill the empty space.

However we can find ways to co-exist and use our supposed 'bigger brains' to outmaneuver them. Imagine that. It'll be no different in the Netherlands. Thankfully they're a protected species there. The Dutch figured out how to live under the water level, surely they can outsmart some beavers.

Was about to post the exact same thing.

I think MS put their foot in their mouths with this promise.

I sure hope this guy or his lawyers see this.

Might be funny to see how much it'd cost to build an iPad from scratch based on these costs.

Agree a lot of this helps!

I read an interview with someone who joined Pogacar's squad in the last year, and was talking about how he almost never does any 'social rides' any more. That 'every ride is a workout and training ride'.

I think some riders/teams (maybe many or most) have actually been on the 'soft' side. LSD rides used to be the norm. Pretty sure that doesn't happen with the fastest riders now. (LSD = Long, Slow, Distance, and they'd often emphasize the S.)